The Skoda Kylaq and Mahindra XUV 3XO have both received 5-star safety ratings in their Bharat NCAP crash tests. But how do they compare in terms of actual scores? Let’s analyze their performance to see why the Skoda Kylaq stands out.
Bharat NCAP Crash Test Results And Scores
| Parameters | Skoda Kylaq | Mahindra XUV 3XO |
|---|---|---|
| Adult Occupant Protection (AOP) Score | 30.88 / 32 Points | 29.36 / 32 Points |
| Adult Safety Rating | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier Test Score | 15.04 / 16 Points | 13.36 / 16 Points |
| Side Movable Deformable Barrier Test Score | 15.84 / 16 Points | 16 / 16 Points |
| Child Occupant Protection (COP) Score | 45 / 49 Points | 43 / 49 Points |
| Child Safety Rating | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Child Safety Dynamic Score | 24 / 24 Points | 24 / 24 Points |
Now, let’s break down how each SUV performed in detail.
Skoda Kylaq Crash Test Performance
- Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier Test:
- The Kylaq provided ‘good’ protection for all co-driver body parts.
- The driver’s chest and left tibia received an ‘adequate’ rating, while other areas were rated ‘good’.
- Side Movable Deformable Barrier Test:
- Protection was rated ‘good’ for all parts except the chest, which received an ‘adequate’ rating.
- Side Pole Impact Test:
- The dummy received ‘good’ protection for all body parts.
- Child Occupant Protection (COP) Test:
- Scored 8/8 for dynamic safety and 4/4 for front and side protection for both 18-month-old and 3-year-old dummies.
Mahindra XUV 3XO Crash Test Performance
- Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier Test:
- The co-driver received ‘good’ protection for all parts.
- The driver’s head, neck, pelvis, and thighs were rated ‘good’.
- The chest, left tibia, and legs got an ‘adequate’ rating, while the right tibia was rated ‘poor’.
- Side Movable Deformable Barrier Test & Side Pole Impact Test:
- The dummy received ‘good’ protection for all parts in both tests.
- Child Occupant Protection (COP) Test:
- Matched the Kylaq, scoring full points for front and side impact protection.
Final Takeaway: Which One Is Safer?
- The Skoda Kylaq had better frontal crash test ratings, with ‘adequate’ leg protection compared to the XUV 3XO’s ‘marginal’ and ‘poor’ ratings.
- In the side impact test, both SUVs performed well, but the XUV 3XO excelled in the side movable deformable barrier test.
- The Kylaq achieved a higher overall COP score (45/49 vs. 43/49), likely due to its superior vehicle assessment rating (9/13 vs. 7/13).
Safety Features Comparison
| Safety Feature | Skoda Kylaq | Mahindra XUV 3XO |
| Airbags | 6 (standard) | 6 (standard) |
| Electronic Stability Control (ESC) | ✅ | ✅ |
| Traction Control | ✅ | ✅ |
| Tyre Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Rear Parking Camera & Sensors | ✅ | ✅ (360-degree) |
| Rear Defogger | ✅ | ✅ |
| ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) | ❌ | ✅ (adaptive cruise control, autonomous braking, lane keep assist) |
Price And Rivals
| Model | Price Range (₹) |
| Skoda Kylaq | 7.89 lakh – 14.40 lakh |
| Mahindra XUV 3XO | 7.99 lakh – 15.56 lakh |
Both SUVs compete in the sub-4m segment against Maruti Brezza, Tata Nexon, Hyundai Venue, Kia Sonet, and Kia Syros.
Which One Should You Choose?
- If you prioritize frontal crash safety and a better COP score, the Skoda Kylaq is the better option.
- If you want better side impact safety and ADAS features, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is a strong contender.
Which SUV would you pick? Let us know in the comments!